|
Global
area for GM crops grows by 8.4 million hactare in 2001:ISAAA
Arbind
Gupta - Mumbai
A
new study by Dr Clive James, chairman of ISAAA (International Service
for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications), confirms that
in 2001, global area of transgenic or GM crops was 52.6 million
hectares or 130 million acres, representing an increase of 8.4 million
hectares or 20 million acres over 2000.
The
principal GM crops were soybean (33 million hectares), corn (10
million), cotton, (7 million hectare) and canola (3 million). These
GM crops were grown in 13 countries by about 5 million farmers,
over 75 per cent of whom were small resource-poor farmers growing
Bt cotton in developing countries. The study presents a global overview
of the cotton crop, an assessment of the performance of Bt cotton
to date, and its future global potential. The focus on developing
countries is consistent with ISAAAs mission to assist developing
countries in assessing the potential of new technologies.
Of
the global 33.5 million hectares (83 million acres) of cotton worth
$ 20 billion, approximately 70 per cent are grown in developing
countries. Asia has up to 60 per cent of world cotton, Africa up
to 15 per cent with 5 per cent in Latin America. There are approximately
20 million cotton farmers globally, 97 per cent of whom farm in
developing countries -- most are small resource-poor farmers growing
two hectares or less of cotton.
Insect
pests are a major problem in cotton and yield losses and insecticides
cost cotton farmers $ 5 billion annually -- 20 per cent of global
insecticides are used on cotton. Cotton farmers used $ 1.7 billion
worth of insecticides in 2001. A novel and very effective method
of controlling the major insect pests of cotton is through genetically-modified
cotton with Bt genes from a soil bacterium, Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt).
Since
1996, 13 million hectares of Bt cotton have been successfully deployed
in nine countries, seven developing and two industrial. These include
US, Mexico, Argentina, and Colombia (pre-commercial) in the Americas,
China, India, Indonesia and Australia in Asia, and South Africa
on the African continent. "Countries that introduced Bt cotton
have derived significant and multiple benefits. These include increased
yield, decreased production costs, a reduction of at least 50 per
cent in insecticide applications, resulting in substantial environmental
benefits to small producers, and significant economic and social
benefits," said Dr James.
Yield
increases for Bt cotton range from 5 to 10 per cent in China, 10
per cent or more in the US and Mexico, 25 per cent in South Africa.
In the US in 2001, Bt cotton increased lint production on 2 million
hectares by over 84,000 metric tonnes (MT) valued at $ 115 million.
In China, seed cotton production on 1.5 million hectares of Bt cotton
increased by 514,000 MT.
The
major benefit has been a decrease of 50 per cent in the number of
insecticide sprays per season, which in turn reduced insecticide
residues that could potentially runoff into watersheds and aquifers
-- a decrease of 14 sprays in China (from 28 to 14 sprays), 7 in
South Africa, and two in the US. Global insecticide savings attributed
to Bt cotton in 2001 were 10,500 MT of insecticide (active ingredient,
a.i.), equivalent to 13 per cent of the 81,200 MT (a.i) of all cotton
insecticides used globally in 2001. From a health perspective, cotton
farmers in China and South Africa applying insecticides by hand
with knapsacks, have significantly less potential exposure to insecticides
when using Bt cotton.
The
economic advantage of Bt cotton versus conventional cotton results
from Bt cottons superior control of insect pests which results
in higher yields, cost savings of 50 per cent on insecticide and
labour, which are partially offset by the higher price of Bt cotton
seed. In the US, in 2001 economic gain for Bt cotton was $ 50 per
hectare $ 100 million nationally. In China, economic gain from Bt
cotton was $ 500 per cent hectare with a national benefit of $ 750
million. In China, in 2001 over 4 million resource-poor cotton farmers
as well as several thousand in the Makhathini Flats in South Africa
derived significant economic benefits from Bt cotton, supporting
the 2001 UNDP Human Development Report thesis that biotechnology
can contribute to the alleviation of poverty.
Bt
cotton significantly increases income and saves time, which is particularly
valuable for small resource-poor Bt cotton farmers in developing
countries. In China, the increased income allows poor farm families
to spend more on food and increase nutritional standards. In South
Africa, where 50 per cent of the cotton farmers are women, Bt cotton
gives them more time to care for children, the sick, and/or generate
additional income from other activities.
"It
is important that a human face is put on the benefits of Bt cotton,"
said Dr James. For the average cotton holding of 1.7 hectares in
the Makhathini Flats in South Africa, in a typical season, a woman
farmer is relieved of 12 days of arduous spraying, saves over 1,000
litres of water (over 250 US gallons), walks 100 km less, has less
potential exposure to insecticides, and increases her income by
approximately $ 85 per season, through using Bt cotton, rather than
conventional cotton.
Bt
cotton occupies 4 million hectares today but has the potential to
deliver significant benefits on at least half of the worlds
33.5 million hectare of cotton with medium to high insect pest levels.
With optimal deployment of Bt cotton the projected annual insecticide
saving is estimated at 33,000 MT (a.i), equivalent to 37 per cent
of the 81,200 MT (a.i.) of cotton insecticides used globally in
2001.
To
date, nine countries have adopted Bt cotton and are benefiting,
but what about the 50 key countries that grow cotton throughout
the world. The challenge is to provide the same opportunity for
the potential beneficiary countries, with small to modest areas
of cotton, in the developing world. Experience to date in several
developing countries has clearly demonstrated that Bt cotton can
deliver significant economic, environmental, and social benefits
to millions of resource-poor farmers that are assigned high priority
by the donor community.
|