|
My Space
Scope for co-operation between India and China in textile business
M D Dewani
After the recent abolition of quota-restrictions on international business
in cotton textiles and apparels, possibilities of severe competition among various
manufacturers cannot be ruled out. But there are also areas where China and
India, leading global manufacturers of these products, can cooperate for mutual
benefit. Former Texprocil chairman Mr M M Sheth who was recently invited by
the China National Textile and Apparel Council (CNTAC) to address the Second
Textile Economic Forum in Beijing, was emphatic that such a cooperation in certain
areas between China and India, can benefit both the sides.
According to Mr Sheth, China initiated effective and decisive steps almost a
decade ago by investing massive sums in modernisation and upgradation of its
industry. As a result, China has become a leader in international trade in textiles
and clothing. India, though a late starter, is now accelerating modernisation
of its industry and the Union government's Vision Statement on textile industry
envisages exports worth US $ 50 billion by 2010.
However, according to Mr Sheth there are certain areas where through mutual
cooperation both the sides can achieve betterment of common interests in international
sourcing of textiles and garments and thereby promote healthy development.
China, he says, has been a net importer of cotton. While India has emerged as
a surplus producer of this natural fibre. Moreover, the quality of Indian cotton
has also improved and may improve further in view of increasing attention being
paid to this. China can benefit immensely by importing large quantities of cotton
from India.
Because of its highly vibrant and modernised spinning industry, India has emerged
as the largest supplier of cotton yarn to the world. some Indian spinning mills
have become dedicated suppliers of high quality cotton yarn of fine counts suitable
for production of high quality shirting and dress materials. China can explore
the possibility of procuring such high quality cotton yarn from India.
India has also developed expertise in the manufacture of made-up articles like
bed sheets, bed linen terry towels, etc. Perhaps a meaningful dialogue between
the two sides can help both of them to optimise mutual advantages in this regard
in international markets. Mr Sheth was of the view that a joint technical committee,
consisting of representatives from both the sides can help in sketching a road
map for further action in this direction.
It is well recognised by all concerned that with the changing life style of
consumers, designing of textiles and garment products will be a crucial factor
apart from production costs. India has some world-renowned designers. China
can consider utilising their services for maximising the advantage from this
in the international markets.
While quota restrictions have been abolished, it is feared that some of the
importing countries may impose anti-dumping and safeguard restrictions. Both
China and India are experiencing problems with regard to rules of origin which
are unilaterally imposed by some countries. Both can join hands to ensure that
such measures are implemented in an equitable and just manner.
Moreover, the tariff rates in some of those countries are unduly high. China
and India can work together to bring down these tariff rates to reasonable levels.
Another area on which the two sides can cooperate pertains to abolition of export
subsidies. WTO's recent decision with regard to abolition of subsidies from
cotton is a case in point. Both the sides can join hands to create an atmosphere
for the removal of all barriers impeding the growth of international trade in
textiles and clothing.
After the World War II, a large number of Indian trading houses were marketing
textiles of different countries like China, Japan, etc to countries in Africa
and elsewhere. India and China can evolve a suitable marketing strategy for
developing exports to various countries.
Already CNTAC and Texprocil have signed an MoU for mutual cooperation and Texprocil
has been trying to activate this MoU. In this context, Mr Sheth feels that timely
dissemination of market intelligence by both the countries would go a long way
in building up relationship to mutual advantage.
The theory of international division of labour assumes that every country has
got some core areas of strength. The free-trade system should enable each country
an opportunity to build on its unique strength. China and India should exploit
advantages flowing from areas of cooperation. Strategic partnership between
the two will ensure that efforts of each other are complemented rather than
supplanted, he says, and adds that China and India can also cooperate with each
other to ensure that prices of textiles and clothing are not unduly depressed.
|